Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 33-37

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

No fingering in AI

Fingering in FE (→EE,GE1GE1aGE2)

GE4 (→GE5)

..

Chopin's fingering given in bars 33 and 37 in the main text originates from FE (→EE,GE1GE1aGE2). In GE3 another two numerals were added in bar 33 and in GE4 (→GE5) the fingering of both bars was unified, by giving only the first five numerals in each of them.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 33

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

..

We add cautionary sharps before the 1st chord in the R.H. and the 1st semiquaver in the L.H. The signs before the chord were already added in GE4 (→GE5).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 33-34

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

Long accents in AI

Short accents in FE (→GE1GE1aGE2)

Differentiated accents in EE

Differentiated accents in GE3 (→GE4GE5)

..

In AI, the accents over the chords in these bars are undoubtedly long and this is the notation we adopt to the main text. FE has short accents (only the third one could be possibly considered as long), which seems to be less convincing, as far as the music is concerned, and probably results from an incomplete understanding of [A]. The accents in the remaining editions were subject to further modifications, most probably accidental.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 34

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

 in AI

 in FE (→GE,EE)

 suggested by the editors

..

, uncommon in Chopin's autographs, is probably erroneous. Out of a few possible conjectures –  – we suggest , which, according to us, corresponds best to the context between cresc. and . Cf. bars 1 and 16.  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f

b. 34

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

No marks in AIFE (→GE,EE)

Accents suggested by the editors

..

Lack of the accents must be considered here as an inaccuracy of notation – the accents are in the previous bar and in bars 37-38.

category imprint: Editorial revisions