b. 33-37
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Chopin's fingering given in bars 33 and 37 in the main text originates from FE (→EE,GE1→GE1a→GE2). In GE3 another two numerals were added in bar 33 and in GE4 (→GE5) the fingering of both bars was unified, by giving only the first five numerals in each of them. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
We add cautionary sharps before the 1st chord in the R.H. and the 1st semiquaver in the L.H. The signs before the chord were already added in GE4 (→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In AI, the accents over the chords in these bars are undoubtedly long and this is the notation we adopt to the main text. FE has short accents (only the third one could be possibly considered as long), which seems to be less convincing, as far as the music is concerned, and probably results from an incomplete understanding of [A]. The accents in the remaining editions were subject to further modifications, most probably accidental. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
, uncommon in Chopin's autographs, is probably erroneous. Out of a few possible conjectures – , , , – we suggest , which, according to us, corresponds best to the context between cresc. and . Cf. bars 1 and 16. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
|||||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Lack of the accents must be considered here as an inaccuracy of notation – the accents are in the previous bar and in bars 37-38. category imprint: Editorial revisions |