Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In GE, the note D is furnished with a dot despite the fact that a wedge is clearly visible in A. The sign was entirely omitted from FE (→EE) (cf. bar 13 and bars 5 and 9). GE (→FE→EE have only dots as staccato signs in the entire Mazurka. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||||
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The absence of a staccato dot in FE (→EE) is probably due to oversight on the part of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
It is not clear whether the accent written in A was meant to be a short one or a long one. GE (→FE) has a short accent here, and the inaccurate placement of that mark in FE brought about its erroneous interpretation in EE. However, a comparison with the analogous bars 11, 51 and 59 points to the long accent option as being more probable. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We give the precise notation of A, which later underwent gradual distortions in GE1 and FE (→EE): first the omission of the dot and moving of the accent, then lowering of the curved line. As a result, in FE (→EE) the note a is sustained, which almost certainly goes against Chopin's intentions, as changes did not have the nature of corrections at any stage category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
 
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |