Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 58-59
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In the main text, we give a single category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We suggest supplementing a slur over a pair of chords, after the slur found in analogous bars 3 and 51 in A. GE2 (→GE3) also had that sign supplemented (on the basis of the comparison with analogous bars) yet the distorted notation of GE was repeated there. Cf. note to bar 11. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We supplement articulation marks for the left hand in line with the authentic markings in analogous bars 4, 12 and 52. These markings were already supplemented in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In EE and GE2 (→GE3), the asterisk category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
in 
) marks at line break could mean one longer dynamic change.
before the grace note f2. A similar addition was made in 
in 
mark without closing is a characteristic device for Chopin's notation – cf. endings of the Mazurka in A flat major no. 3 and B flat minor no. 4.