Issues : GE revisions

b. 32

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

Articulation markings in  A and (→GE2GE3)

GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The absolutely clear markings of A were reproduced very inaccurately in GE1 (→FEEE). In GE2 (→GE3) the notation of A was restored.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 32-33

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

A double bar line in A and GE2 (→GE3)

A single bar line in  GE1 (→FEEE)

..

In A, the next part of the Mazurka is notated after a double bar line. That detail was not included in GE1 (→FEEE), but restored in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 33-44

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

8 long accents in A

Without an accent in bar 42 in GE1

 

7 accents (2 types) in FE

7 short accents in EE

..

In the main text, we give the unequivocal notation of A – 8 long accents in bars 33-36 and 41-44. In GE1 (→FEEE) the accent in bar 42 was omitted, which was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). In the two last-mentioned editions and also in FE some accents were reproduced as short ones, and EE has short accents only. All those changes result from difficulties in interpreting accent signs of varying length.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 33

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

..

We add a cautionary  before b1. A similar addition was made in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 33-34

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

A phrase mark in A

A curved line [slur] in GE1 (→FE) and GE3

No slur in GE2

A tie in EE

..

The phrase mark in  A, just like two further ones in analogous situations, embraces the motif that consists of two thirds a flat1-c2. The meaning of that curved line in GE1 (→FE) is no longer clear, as it could just as well be interpreted as a tie sustaining as1. This is at least how the reviewer of GE2 understood it, which is evidenced by the change made in bars 34-35. In the discussed place in GE2 the slur was omitted, probably with the intention to move the slur of GE1 up in order to turn it more clearly into a tie (it reappeared in GE3). The engraver of EE read the line to be a tie sustaining a flat1 and engraved it in a manner that left no room for doubt.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions