b. 57
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 58-59
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In the main text, we give a single mark. In Chopin's times, dividing the dynamic hairpins at line break was not yet in systematic use - both Chopin and his editors sometimes reverted to the old notation in which two consecutive (or ) marks at line break could mean one longer dynamic change. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The lack of in A is doubtless an oversight. The mark added in GE (→FE→EE) under the 3rd crotchet may have been the result of Chopin's correction. We move it to the end of the bar, exactly as Chopin marked in A the pedalling for all the analogous bars. Cf. the note to bars 49-50. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In the main text we give the version written into FES and FED. The remaining sources have the version as in bar 3 and analogous bars. That type of adding variety to the melodic line is very characteristic of Chopin. He introduced similar changes, also as later corrections, in Mazurka in C major no. 2, bars 102-103, and also in other works. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Main-line changes |
|||||||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The 1st finger written into FES applies the enriched version of the melodic line in that edition (our main text - see the neighbouring note). However, it may also be used for the version of A and the first editions. category imprint: Differences between sources |