b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The line added in FES may be a slur, yet it is not certain. The sign may be a teaching hint rather than a suggestion of alternative phrasing. The traces of removing a longer slur (extending from the semiquaver f sharp1 to g1 in bar 62) in A prove that Chopin's decision was a well-thought-out one. Therefore we do not take the entry of FES into consideration in our main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Corrections in A , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants |
|||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We give the markings of A. In GE (→FE→EE) only the dot was left, which is probably the result of inaccurate reading of the manuscript. The slur was probably added in A after the deletion of the sixth on the 3rd beat of the left hand, so there is no reason to omit it. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Accompaniment changes |