b. 2-3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
AI is missing the indications cresc. and con forza. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
Omission of in FE (→GE,EE) is rather a result of the engraver's distraction than Chopin's proofreading. The composer, who in two other places in the Etude – in bar 48 and 56 – added when proofreading FE, could have accepted the lack of this indication. Therefore, we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In bar 5 and in the 1st half of bar 6, in AI, instead of part of the L.H., there is come sopra, which, in this context, undoubtedly refers to bars 1-2 and means repetition of the notation of the first three groups of semiquavers. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
b. 6-8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The range and meaning of the slurs of A is not entirely clear. In the main text we give the graphically and musically unambiguous slur of FE (→GE,EE), which is probably a result of Chopin's proofreading. The short slur of AI is probably fragmented (cf. bars 2-4). category imprint: Differences between sources |