data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 10-15
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The mordents over d category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The shorter slur of AI (written in bars 3-4) certainly does not reflect Chopin's complete intention in terms of slurring. We give the unambiguous slur of A (→FE→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 14-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slur of A gradually fades due to the ending ink, hence it is uncertain where it was supposed to end, according to Chopin. The short slur of AI is probably fragmented (cf. bars 2-4). In the main text, we give the unambiguous slur of FE (→GE,EE), which could have been proofread by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In AI the minim is written on the level of e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate note pitch in A |
||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |