mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 65-67

composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor

No fingering in AI & A (→FE→GE)

Fingering in EE

Fingering written in FED
..

In the main text we consider the fingering of the L.H., added by Chopin in FED. In EE Fontana added the fingering both in the right and L.H. The latter is partially compatible with Chopin's entry in a pupil's copy.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED

b. 65

composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor

Semiquavers in AI

Rest in A (→FE→GE,EE)
..

Initially, the version of AI was also written in A, where Chopin then deleted it (erased) and replaced with the final text, repeated by FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

b. 67

composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor

No sign in AI & A (→FE)

 in GE & EE
..

Omission of the  mark at the end of the pieces is characteristic for Chopin's pedalling and is featured in numerous works, e.g., in the Etudes in C major, No. 1, C minor, No. 4, C major, No. 7, F major, No. 8, E major, No. 11. The revisers of GE and EE considered it as an inaccuracy of notation of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark