|
b. 7-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In AI the 2nd halves of bars 7, 8 and 16 were briefly marked with the // sign. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||
|
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The indications of AI do not take into consideration the relations of this bar – agogic and dynamic – with the next bar and subsequent phrase. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
|
b. 7-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The incomplete staccato indications in A were added in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). What is interesting is the fact that all dots are also in AI. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
Lack of slurs in EE3 is certainly an error. The slurs in EE4 were added as a part of far-reaching additions, including bars 2-16 (cf. also the note to bars 9-16). In both autographs, the slur in the 1st half of the bar does not embrace the extreme semiquavers, which is almost certainly only an inaccuracy of the notation. From the formal point of view, AI has such a slur also in the 2nd half of the bar, which in this manuscript is briefly marked as a repetition of the 1st. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The version of A (→FE) is almost certainly erroneous. It is revealed by the notation of AI in this bar and a compatible version of all sources in analogous bar 44. The correct text of GE and EE is most probably a result of revisers' actions, probably on the basis of comparison with bar 44. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Errors of A |
in 
in 