Issues : EE inaccuracies
b. 30-31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly only authentic version of the accents on the d1-f1 and d1-f1 thirds in bars 30 and 31 respectively. The remaining versions are almost certainly a result of revisions or misinterpretation of the base texts by the engravers. Lack of signs in bar 31 in GE may prove that they were added in the last proofreading of FE. The last accent in A is clearly shorter, which, according to us, is an inaccuracy of Chopin's notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||||||
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The long accent in AI (in this and in the next bar) proves that highlighting the c note was an important element of the sound concept of this fragment from the very beginning. However, the clearly short sign in A (→FE→GE) opens the issue of the type of accent, with which Chopin wanted to provide this note. According to us, it is the notation of the fair score that is inaccurate in this case, however, as we are not certain, in the main text we reproduce the notation of the main source. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in EE , EE inaccuracies , Sign reversal |
|||||||||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
One can have doubts concerning the type of the accent used in A to indicate the beginning of the motif. According to us, it is the long accent that is more likely. In FE (→GE1) the sign was reproduced inaccurately, so that in EE2 (→EE3) it was placed over the 2nd semiquaver in the bar. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |