Slurs
|
b. 42-43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
Chopin omitted in A the last of the slurs embracing subsequent pairs of semiquavers. It is almost certainly an oversight, therefore, in the main text we suggest adding the slur. In FE (→GE1), the previous slur was also omitted, which was completed in EE2. The subsequent GE and EE have all slurs here. AI, in which all pairs of semiquavers are ascribed to the R.H., has one slur over the entire passage. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 44-45
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In A (→FE→GE1,EE2) Chopin omitted the last of the slurs embracing the next pairs of semiquavers. It is almost certainly an oversight, therefore, in the main text we suggest to add the slur. The subsequent GE and EE have all slurs here. AI, in which all pairs of semiquavers are ascribed to the R.H., has one slur over the entire passage. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 51-52
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In GE1 (→GE1a) there is no slur in the L.H. at the transition between these bars. In the subsequent GE, a slur was added. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In A Chopin overlooked one of the slurs in the L.H. (in AI there are no slurs in this fragment at all). The engraver of FE (→EE2) omitted the previous slur too. In the remaining editions these patent inaccuracies were corrected. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
|
b. 54-55
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
