b. 52
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The version of AI is undoubtedly earlier and was changed – as it seems, definitely – already at the stage of writing A (→FE→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
b. 53-54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The c-c1 octave at the last semiquaver in bar 53 was written by Chopin in AI after trying a number of different versions. The version, written in the final form in A, was then changed by Chopin for an a-f1 sixth at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE). Of course, the fingering added by Fontana in EE concerns only the last version (cf. bars 53-57). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 53-57
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The fingering of EE is an addition of Fontana. See also bars 53-54. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give written in A. As in many different cases (see e.g. the Etude in C minor, No. 4, bar 1), in FE (→GE) is almost certainly a result of misunderstanding of the manuscript by the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |