Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 38

composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major

..

The differences in type, placement and even the number of accents, present in the sources, are considered in the previous remark, together with rhythm.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 39

composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major

Long accent in A

FE (→#Wn1,EE)

Short accent in GE2 (→GE3GE4)

..

The long accent, written in A over the 3rd semiquaver in the R.H., was placed between the staves in FE (→GE1,EE, in the latter rather a short accent), so it can be interpreted as referring to both parts of the hands or only to the L.H. In GE2 (→GE3GE4) the mark was changed to a short accent, clearly referring to the minim. In the main text we give the accent between the staves modelled on FE, which in a certain manner previews the accents in the following bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 40

composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major

Accent in A, literal reading

Accent in A, contextual interpretation

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

..

It is uncertain whether the accent in A should be interpreted as short, which is indicated by its size, or as long, same as two subsequent in this bar. We give preference to the 2nd interpretation. Omitting the mark in FE (→GE,EE) is almost certainly a mistake, as Chopin's deletion of an accent marking the beginning of a five-element progression seems to be totally unlikely.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in FE

b. 40

composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major

Long accents in A

FE (→EE)

Short accents in GE

Possible short accents in A

..

In FE (→GE,EE) the accents were assigned to the right hand and put over the upper stave. The notation of A is ambiguous in this respect, therefore, in the main text we place the signs between the staves. In GE short accents were used, in accordance with this edition's most frequent manner of reproducing all "accent-like" signs of different length featured in FE. Also in this aspect the notation of A is not entirely unanimous, hence we permit an alternative interpretation of the accents as short. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 41

composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major

Short accent in A (→FEGE,EE)

Possible interpretation of A

Possible long accent in A

Our suggestion

..

According to us, the comparison with the accents from the previous bar suggests that both the placement and the kind of accent written in A (FEGE,EE) may be interpreted in two ways, which we include in variant suggestions.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents