Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
According to us, omission of the long accent at the beginning of the bar and the hairpins at the end in FE (→GE,EE) is a result of distraction (haste) of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 45-47
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
According to us, the marks, written in A at the end of bars 45 and 47, should be interpreted as long accents. In FE (→GE,EE) the mark in bar 45 was given a form of hairpins, while the mark in bar 47 was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In A the characteristic placement of the sign slightly after the note indicates a long accent. In the editions it was reproduced as a common short accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we do not include the accent, added in EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4) by analogy to bar 45 (together with the slurs). The accentuation of these bars can be different, as they also differ in dynamic indications – in bar 47 there is no mark, added during a proofreading of FE in bar 45. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |