



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Two long accents in FE (→GE1→GE1a) were certainly added by Chopin. They confirm the way in which Chopin understood all signs written with the first appearance of this phrase (bars 69-70). All subsequent versions are undoubtedly a result of inaccuracy or revision. We suggest to add the accent in the 2nd half of bar 74, as it seems highly unlikely that Chopin would want the last motif to be performed in a different way. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 75-76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The long accents visible in A were interpreted in FE as a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 79-80
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
All articulation indications and accents in bars 79-84 were added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→EE). However, the attention is drawn by the fact that the slurs were introduced in the entire four-bar section, yet the accents appear only in bars 79-80. It is unclear whether it is a result of distraction (Chopin's or the engraver's) or a conscious decision of the composer, which, after all, does not have to indicate a change in the performance manner, as the accents in bars 79-80 may be interpreted as a model valid until the end of bar 82. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 83-84
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |