Slurs
|
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The slur of A was inaccurately reproduced in FE, as the part falling on bar 27 (the last in the line) was omitted. Perhaps it contributed to its omission in EE2. The sign was added in later EE,s. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE |
||||||
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
By shortening the slur, the engravers of GE and EE4 probably considered the slur of FE as inaccurate. In the main text we try to render the plausible sense of the literally interpreted notation of A (→FE→EE2→EE3) in a possibly legible way. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 28-29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
|
b. 29-31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In the main text we give the interpretation of ambiguous slurs of A compliant with Chopin's proofreading of the slurs in FE in analogous bars 25-27. In FE (→GE,EE) both slurs were interpreted as embracing only the 2nd halves of bars 29 and 30. According to us, the interpretation may be considered as an equal variant in relation to the main text, as Chopin, in a sense, authorised it by adding staccato dots in bar 30. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 32-33
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
