Slurs
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 65-67
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
According to us, the slur of A is inaccurately written on both sides (too short). In FE (→GE,EE) the beginning of the slur was correctly interpreted, whereby the end was left according to the classic rule of not exceeding the bar line. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
b. 73-74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In these bars A does not have any performance indications in the part of the L.H., which in this context should be understood as a suggestion that the ones given in the analogous situation four bars before should still be valid. Due to the fact that Chopin added here accents while proofreading FE, we suggest to add the slurs too. The idea was already performed in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) and – to a greater extent – in EE3 (→EE4). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |