Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 16-17

composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major

Beginning of slur in A, literal reading

Direct interpretation of A (→FEGE,EE)

Contextual interpretation of A

..

The slur in A begins over the penultimate note in bar 16, yet Chopin undoubtedly thought of a3 as the first note under the slur and so it was recreated in the editions. According to us, it is, however, very likely that Chopin mistook the last group in bar 16 with the first group in bar 17, which also starts with a3. At the time of writing the slur, the composer, in haste, could have considered the beginning of the octave sign as coinciding with the beginning of the new phrase, which he probably wanted to embrace with the slur. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 17-22

composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major

No slurs in A

Slur in FE (→GE,EE2)

Slurs in EE3 (→EE4)

Our suggestion

..

We think that the slur added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE) should be interpreted as the articulation model for the next pairs of quavers. Perhaps Chopin thought that the long accents alone are enough to suggest a correct performance. In order to avoid doubts, in the main text we suggest to complete the slurs. The additions, to a slightly greater extent, were also performed in EE3 (→EE4); according to us, the version can be considered as an alternative proposal of the authentic notation's development.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 18

composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major

End of slur in A

FE (→GE,EE)

..

According to us, the slur of A reaches the last note of the bar, further than it was interpreted in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 19-22

composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major

Slur in A (→FEGE1GE1aGE2)

Ambiguous slur in EE

No slur in GE3 (→GE4GE5)

Our suggestion

..

In A the slur abruptly ends before the last note of bar 19, which, in our opinion, must be considered as the notation's inaccuracy. In the main text we suggest an interpretation and completion of slurring in accordance with the phrases' structure.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 23

composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major

Longer slur in A (→FEGE,EE)

Our alternative suggestion

..

In the subsequent bars the slurring and articulation of semiquavers were changed by Chopin. Certain details of the intended result of these changes are not clear, while one of the possible interpretations assumes the slur to be shortened.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions