



b. 18-24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
The missing dashes limiting the range of cresc. in bars 18-20 and 23-24 is a very common defect of the first editions of Chopin's works. Moreover, in GE there is no cresc. in bar 18, which also must be considered as a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
The text does not raise any doubts here, yet the notation of accidentals differs in particular sources and it is not always precise. In FE the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 18-19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In FE (→EE3) there is no ending of the slur in bar 19 (in the new line). It is a common mistake of the first editions of Chopin's works, particularly French, as well as of the autographs. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In A Chopin did not write arpeggio wavy lines next to the chords in the L.H. in the entire bar, which is certainly an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 19-21
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In A there is a visible change of the inner note of the 5th chord in the R.H. – in bar 19 Chopin first wrote e category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |