Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 44-47
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In the main text we give the interpretation of the slurs of A in bars 44-45 and 46-47 which is compliant with the unequivocal slurring of analogous bars 25-26. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In the main text we give the wedge written in A, most probably overlooked in FE (→GE). In EE a dot was added in this place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
The beginning of the slur in A is certainly inaccurate. The omission of this slur in the editions is certainly a result of an oversight. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
|
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In the main text we give the range of hairpins after A, as the minor shifts, to which they were subject in the editions, each time result from an inaccurate interpretation of the base text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||||
|
b. 50-51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In the main text we give the pairs of dynamic hairpins after A. We interpret the very short marks at the end of the bars, resembling accents, as diminuendos due to the analogy with motifs in bars 1-2 and analog. In the editions only the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
in 
