|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In FE (→EE) the lower tie and slur were omitted, certainly by mistake. The error was corrected in GE. Cf. bar 62. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Chopin most probably added the R.H. slur at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE). Cf. bars 20-23. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The rhythmic value of the chord in FE – a minim – is probably erroneous, as in the 2nd half of the bar there is no relevant rest. The error was corrected both in EE (by adding a rest) and GE (by changing the minim to a semibreve). In the main text we give the latter, compliant with the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The fingering printed in FE is certainly authentic, however, it includes a patent error consisting in switching the digits. Chopin partially corrected this mistake by writing '3' in FED instead of '2' for the 2nd note in bar 25. In the main text we give the already fully corrected version of this fingering, already introduced in GE. Fontana, while checking and adding the fingering in EE, also corrected this error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A there are visible traces of changes in the slurring in the L.H. The original slurs generally embraced four notes: category imprint: Interpretations within context; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A |
