data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 19-23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
For each source we give the pairs of hairpins appearing under similar figures in the L.H. in the unified version. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||
b. 19-24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
We give the slurring of the figures in the L.H. in the standardised version, despite the fact that a few slurs are slightly inaccurately written. category imprint: Interpretations within context |
||||||
b. 20-23
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The slur over the motif in the R.H. in bars 22-23 was probably added by Chopin at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE). According to us, the lack of a similar addition over the first motif is an inaccuracy of notation, hence in the main text we suggest a suitable addition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |