



Pitch
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Chopin took the decision to lower the fifth already at the stage of preparing the base text for FE. Ap also has the final version with f. Similarly in analogous bars 12 and 39. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes |
|||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and EE2 the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of CLI |
|||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI the lower note is an erroneous f2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
|||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The lack of e1 in CLI may be the original version or – which is much more probable – an error of the copyist (omissions of internal notes of the chords written on ledger lines were quite frequent at the time of reading Chopin's autographs). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
On the 2nd beat of the bar in the R.H. we give the E minor triad (with a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |