Pitch
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and FEcor there is no returning e2 on the 8th semiquaver in the bar. The sign was added in a later proofreading of FE (→GE,EE); it is also present in Ap. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI |
||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
We add a cautionary before g2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Chopin removed a1 on the 2nd beat in the bar in a later proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). The inconvenience of the repetition present in the original version was also removed in Ap. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and Ap the 7th and 15th semiquavers are written as a1. At the same time, the notation of Ap is faultless, whereas in CLI there is no returning a1 on the 4th beat of the bar. The latter also appears in FEcor, in which Chopin added the , yet only before the last note. It was moved to the correct position only in a later proofreading of FE (→EE2→EE3), which, eventually, displays an entirely correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Enharmonic corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Neither in CLI nor in Ap there are cautionary naturals before the 2nd crotchet in the L.H. Chopin would add signs at different stages of the Etude's publication preparations – before B in the base text for FE, before F in a later proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |