



Pitch
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Accidental below/above the note |
|||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Determining the sound of the 2nd and 14th semiquavers poses some difficulties. According to us, Chopin had in mind e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 86-87
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In both bars A has additional sharps before f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 94-95
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Chopin introduced a different edition of the final chords while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). In bar 95 the notation of A is unclear, as far as the rhythmic values are concerned – f2 (the lowest note in this version) has a minim stem, which is incomprehensible in this context. In A it is also the most probably erroneous c2 in the 2nd chord in the R.H. (changed later in a proofreading of FE to d2) that draws attention. It is probably an unadjusted mark of the still earlier version whose traces are visible in A. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Authentic corrections of FE |