Issues : Corrections in A

b. 2

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

..

In A there are visible traces of deleting the original version of the 1st quaver in the L.H. It seems that its notation did not go beyond the staff, it could have been, e.g., the F-c fifth. 

category imprint: Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A

b. 4-8

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

..

In A it can be seen that the crotchets in the middle of bars 4 (g) and 8 (f) were originally written as quavers after which relevant rests would follow.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A

b. 12

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

..

In A there are visible traces of deleting the Gnote. It is unclear whether it was supposed to be a part of the G1-G octave or to be autonomous, instead of of the final version.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A

b. 13

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Minim in A

Semibreve in FE (→GE,EE)

..

In A, in the middle of the bar there was originally a minim c-g-echord, which was then deleted and replaced with a rest. Eventually, while proofreading FE (→GE,EE), Chopin gave the initial fifth the value of a semibreve. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 44

composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

..

Initially, the 1st group of semiquavers in A was . Chopin deleted it and wrote the final version below. It seems that he did not check the influence of the change on the notation of the subsequent part of the bar – there is no  before the 3rd note in the 2nd group of semiquavers, while in the 3rd group there remains a  before g, which is however justified also as a cautionary accidental, yet it was written probably due to g in the original version.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Cautionary accidentals