



Pitch
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
At the beginning of the bar A have category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Last key signature sign |
||||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The flat added in GE2 (→GE3→GE4) is certainly non-authentic. Moreover, there is no reason to suppose Chopin's oversight, as e1 is harmonically more justified than e category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In A there are no accidentals before the upper minim in the L.H. at the beginning of the bar and before the penultimate semiquaver in the R.H. First of these undeniable oversights was corrected already in FE (→GE,EE), the second – only in GE.
In A the flat before the 5th semiquaver (e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Accidental below/above the note , Last key signature sign |
||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The bottom note of the 1st chord in FE is e. This clearly erroneous note was accurately corrected to f in GE and EE. A correction in pencil was also written in FES. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The flat returning b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |