



Pitch
b. 37-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The sources differ in the presence of accidentals, which, however, does not raise any doubts concerning the text's interpretation. Considering the fact that Chopin and a part of his editors used slightly different rules of validity of the signs written with the use of the octave sign, we state that A is missing two necessary signs, a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves |
|||||||||
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 41-42
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In both bars in A (→FE), there are no accidentals before the last note of the 2nd group of semiquavers. These patent oversights were completed in GE and EE. The sharps are also written in pencil in FES. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In A there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In A (→FE→EE) the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Annotations in FES |