b. 8-13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In this context, lack of the slur over the semiquavers in the R.H. must be considered as Chopin's inaccuracy, which is justified by the revision introduced in EE4. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In EE six digits of Chopin's fingering were completed with an additional '1' at the beginning of the 4th group of semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 9-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The accents added in FE (→GE,EE) may be a result of Chopin's proofreading. However, according to us, it is more probable that they were additionally added by the engraver of FE, who either did not observe the change in accentuation or he considered it to be the manuscript's inaccuracy. Cf. the Etude in C major, No. 7, bars 54-55, C minor, No. 12, bars 2-4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
According to us, the 2nd slur in bar 10 and the slur in bars 11-12 were omitted in FE (→GE,EE) due to the engraver's inattention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |