Verbal indications
b. 312
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
No marking in EE may be either an omission or echoes one of the earlier stages of the Scherzo notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||
b. 320
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Since there is in both EE and FE, its lack in GC must be the copyist's omission. Therefore it is awkward to find in GE1. It may well be an error or revision as the marking was later removed from GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 327-335
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present dim. - - - based on the notation in GC (→GE). In EE it is written out in syllables, which is a very characteristic manner of these editions. in FE the marking is not there at all, which was most probably caused by Chopin's hasty wrirting [A2]. See annotations in bars 335 and 336. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 336
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We believe there is little chance that Chopin consciously left out sotto voce at any stage of preparing FE. category imprint: Differences between sources |