GC
compare
b. 320
Since there is in both EE and FE, its lack in GC must be the copyist's omission. Therefore it is awkward to find in GE1. It may well be an error or revision as the marking was later removed from GE2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
See b. 320
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions, Errors of GC
notation: Verbal indications