Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 326-327

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Slurs in EE & GC (→GE)

Slur in FE

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 327-336

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Key signature change in EE & GC (→GE)

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 327-335

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

in EE

in GC (→GE)

No indication in FE

..

In the main text we present dim. - - - based on the notation in GC (→GE). In EE it is written out in syllables, which is a very characteristic manner of these editions. in FE the marking is not there at all, which was most probably caused by Chopin's hasty wrirting [A2]. See annotations in bars 335 and 336.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 330

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Rhythm in EE and an interpretation of GC's script

Rhythm in FE & GE

..

The initial rhythm in RH () is confirmed in EE and also in GC (despite an obvious error - ). Traces of printing edits in FE allow us to see that the rhythm intitially was notated in this edition too but it was changed by Chopin to . We see this variant also in GE, revised most probably based on the rhythm in the earlier phrase, in bars 322 and 326

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC

b. 333

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In FE there is no  augmenting b to b. This is obvious  inaccurracy in Chopin's notation, as when he wrote this bar in [A2] he was convinced that the change of key signatures had already taken place.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals