mUltimate Chopin

Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 105

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

An accent in A (→GE2→GE3)

 in GE1 (→FE)

An accent in EE
..

The accent on the 2nd crotchet of the L.H. visible in A was misinterpreted in GE1 (→FE) as short hairpins . The proper form of that mark was restored in GE2 (→GE3). EE also has that accent, but moved under the stave.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 105

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

 under the L.H.  in A (→GE1→FE→EE)

 between the staves in GE2 (→GE3)
..

The indication  is placed under the 3rd crotchet of the L.H. in A (→GE1→FE→EE). In GE2 (→GE3) it was moved and placed between the staves. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 105

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

No  in A (→GE1→FE)

 in EE and GE2 (→GE3)
..

In A (→GE1→FE), the asterisk  is missing, which must be considered a mistake in that context. We add  at the end of the bar in accordance with the original pedalling of the analogous bar 43. An identical addition was already made in EE and GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of A

b. 106

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

..  

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 106

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

A less probable reading of the accent in A (→GE); GE3
 

 No accent mark in FE (→EE1→EE2)
..

The accent under the 1st note of the bar in A should, in our opinion, be considered a long one. In GE it was reproduced as a short accent, which is hardly surprising in this case.  In FE (→EE1→EE2) the mark was omitted, probably by accident. It reappeared in EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE