b. 265-269
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A there is not a single to the bottom note of the octaves (D) in these bars (as well as in the next ones, until bar 274). The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 265
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A Chopin did not restore the bass clef in this place, which renders the notation illogical until the end of the line in bar 270 (at the beginning of a new line, there is a bass clef). The mistake was corrected in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||
b. 265
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The mark seems absolutely clear in A; however, the engraver could have been confused by the delicate trace of the first, failed attempt to write it – it was only the second time that there was enough ink for an entire mark. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 266-268
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A there are no accidentals in the 2nd half of bar 266 and 268. They were added in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 266-268
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The missing cresc. at the end of bar 266 and 268 is almost certainly a revision by the engraver of GE, who made his work easier by omitting indications he considered pleonastic next to the hairpin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |