Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 143

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Long accent in A, contextual interpretation

Short accent in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

The accent entered into A corresponds to a short accent in terms of size, but the characteristic shift beyond the note points to a long accent, and this is the interpretation we suggest in the main text.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in A

b. 144-145

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Accents in A, literal reading

 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

Long accents in A, contextual interpretation

..

The three A accents raise doubts as to their position and type of accent. In the first two figures the marks are written under the 3rd R.H. bottom voice quaver, while in the third one – slightly earlier. The first and third ones look like short accents; the second one is slightly longer. According to us, it is highly unlikely that Chopin would have wanted the third quaver to be accented. We do not find a strictly analogous place in the entire IV mov. of the Sonata, yet there is a number of similar situations in which we are dealing with accents – in bars 80-83 and 136-137, there are 7 accents in total, and all concern the first quaver, while 6 of them are long accents. Therefore, we could be dealing with an extreme example of one of the ways of marking long accents – marks entered after a note (cf. I mov., bars 82-84). Taking into account the above, in the main text we suggest long accents in the discussed place.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 146-147

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

..

In each of these bars, A does not contain accidentals to the last L.H. chord. Chopin also omitted the  to the last quaver in bar 147. All these inaccuracies were corrected in GE (→FE,IE), while in EE the accidentals are only in bar 147.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE

b. 146

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Wedge & dot in A

2 dots in GE (→FE,IE) & EE2

No marks in EE1

..

Viewed in isolation, the staccato mark over the e crotchet visible in A could be considered a dot or a wedge. The unambiguous wedges next to the three following bass notes provide a clear argument for a wedge also in this place. In GE (→FE,IE) the mark was adjusted to the dot over the chord on the 4th crotchet of this bar.
The absence of the marks in EE1 is due to the engraver's mistake, corrected in EE2.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Wedges

b. 147-148

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

3 wedges & 3 dots in A

2 wedges in GE (→EE,IE)

No marks in FE

..

The dots over the three chords are hardly visible in A (especially the first and third ones) due to the proximity of the top stave and the presence of dynamic hairpins or accents. This explains why they were omitted in GE (→FE,EE,IE). By contrast, the omission of the wedge at the beginning of bar 148 is due to the engraver's inadvertence only. The total absence of the marks in FE can be similarly explained. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE