Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 71

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

No slur in A

Slur in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

Slur suggested by the editors

..

There is no doubt that the first part of the passage is to be performed legato, hence in the main text we suggest adding a slur. It was already added in GE (→FE,EE,IE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 71

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

in A

Longer  in GE (→FE,IE) & EE2

No sign in EE1

..

In this case, the extension of the  hairpin can be considered justified both musically (cf. the previous passages) and graphically – Chopin could have shortened the mark in A for it not to intersect the other elements of notation. Therefore, the version of the editions can be considered an acceptable variant.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions

b. 71

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

..

In EE1 the topmost note of the L.H. minim chord is an f1. This is a patent mistake, corrected in EE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 71

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in A

b. 71

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

No fingering in A (→GEFE,IE)

Fingering in EE

..

In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions