|
b. 43-50
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A the L.H. part is written in shorthand – only top octave notes and the segue con 8 - - - indication. In the editions it was written in full. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
||||||||
|
b. 43-46
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In bars 43-44 and 46 the L.H. quaver groups are not encompassed with slurs. As the vast majority of analogous motifs, both before (bar 16 and 42) and after (bars 171-174, 207-208, 241 and 243), is provided with slurs in A, we add similar slurs in these places too. The slurs were also added by GE (→FE,EE,IE), while in bar 43 EE overlooked the slur. The range of the slurs can be questionable – see the note on bars 45-48. In accordance with the analysis carried out in those bars, we adopt here four-quaver slurs as well. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 43-55
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In this entire fragment, in the R.H. part led mainly in octaves, accidentals before both notes are present only in 3 of them – d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 45
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the fact that one of 5 analogous motifs was left without a slur can be ascribed to Chopin's oversight in A, hence in the main text we suggest adding a slur. It was also added by GE (→FE,EE,IE). See also the note on bars 43-48. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 45
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to the E category imprint: Editorial revisions |
1-d
2 in bar 54. All necessary accidentals were added by 
