b. 298
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 299-300
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Four subsequent octaves, starting from E1-E in bar 299, were initially written an octave higher in A. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Bass register changes |
||||||
b. 301-302
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The comparison with analogous bar 135 suggests that the A slurs are inaccurate here, particularly the one that ends on the last crotchet in bar 301. The beginning of the slur in bar 302 is written with a flourish, yet its shape quite convincingly indicates that it is related to the e2 minim and the respective accent. Taking into account the above, in the main text we give the unquestionable FE slurs (→EE). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
b. 302-304
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
According to us, the short accents in bar 302 and 304 resulted from the inaccuracy of the A notation (→GE), hence in the main text we suggest long accents, as in the preceding phrase. In EE2 the accents were added on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing a2 in FE1 is – as in bar 294 – almost certainly a typical oversight related to the note being at the intersection of a chord's stem and a ledger line. The mistake was corrected in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Uncertain notes on ledger lines |