|
b. 292
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to e category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing arpeggio is most probably an oversight by the copyist or by the engraver of FE1. The sign was added by EE2 after comparing it with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||
|
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A this bar ends a page and does not contain a slur. However, in the next bar Chopin wrote an ending of a slur reaching the 1st note and started a new one from the 2nd note. This undoubtedly proves that the absence of a slur in the discussed bar must be considered a mistake, hence in the main text we add the overlooked fragment of the slur, starting from the last minim, which seems most natural due to the change of register of the minim chord sequence. This is how this notation was interpreted in GE, while EE2 added the slur after GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||
|
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As was the case with stretto in bar 290, più mosso was almost certainly added to A after [FC] had been finished. When interpreted literally, the indication begins over the 2nd crotchet in the bar, which suggests that the tempo should be increased only just starting from that place. However, it is uncertain whether it actually corresponds with Chopin's intention, since in his autographs one can quite often encounter the remaining elements of an earlier manner of placing markings within their scope (cf. bar 109), which in this case would require a tempo change already at the beginning of the bar. This is how it was interpreted in EE2, in which the indication, repeated after GE1, was moved to the beginning of the bar. In the main text we reproduce the A notation; however, the EE2 version can be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
||||||
|
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we give the A slurs (→GE), which provide the beginnings of the analogous phrases in bar 294 and 302 with homogenous articulation. The fact that the first two chords are to be separated was additionally specified with a staccato on the 1st crotchet. The FE slur is most probably authentic and corresponds with the phrasing in analogous bar 127. The EE2 version arbitrarily compiled the slur drawn from FE with the short slur repeated after GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
1 and e
