b. 220
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
After adding the transitional g1 quaver on the 1st beat in A, Chopin remembered to remind us that on the 3rd beat g should be restored. However, he did it in an unfortunate manner by adding a cautionary only to the 2nd quaver in the triplet, g. Consequently, the semiquaver at the end of the bar, when interpreted literally, is still a g1; as far as cautionary accidentals are concerned, a to the G crotchet would be more justified, which appears earlier than the aforementioned quaver. This erroneous and illogical notation was repeated unchanged by GE, whereas a restoring g1 was added only by EE2. We also add it in the main text, omitting the to g. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , Cautionary accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||
b. 220
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 (→EE) the bass crotchet on the 3rd beat is an F. In this context it must be a mistake, corrected – perhaps at Chopin's request – in FE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 220
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 223
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we give the A version (→GE), supplemented after authentic pedal markings in similar situations, e.g. in bar 229. The FE version can be considered an equal variant. We also suggest an alternative interpretation of the imprecise A notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark |
||||||||
b. 223
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Chopin added the time signature marking to A after the basis for FE had been finished, which explains its absence in that edition. EE corrected the mistake by adding a , which was present in bar 1, which could be justified to a certain extent, as the Chopinesque Tempo primo indication may be misleading, since it seems to direct us to the beginning of the piece. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |