|
b. 135-136
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A and FE1 the R.H. bottom voice is missing the naturals raising d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
|
b. 135-140
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In GE1 the first part of the slur beginning in bar 135 was overlooked – it is only just in a new line, from bar 140, that the remaining part of the slur appears. The mistake was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 137
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The fourth in FE1 must be a mistake, which is proven by both the A (→GE) version and the correction in FE2 (→EE), perhaps ordered by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The safest explanation for the absence of the accent in FE (→EE) would be it having been added to A after the basis for FE had been finished ([FC]). An oversight seems to be less likely if we take into account the absence of accents also in bar 144, 146, 148 and 150. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
|
b. 142
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A and FE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
1 to d1 in the 2nd crotchet in bar 135 and in the 4th crotchet in bar 136. In 
to the bottommost note of the last R.H. chord. The patent oversight was corrected in