



b. 82
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In FE (→GE) the stem of the bottom voice quaver is led as far as to g2. This illogical notation could have resulted from the misleading [A] notation – Chopin probably initially wrote the a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 83-84
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
The bass f at the beginning of each of these bars is an erroneous dotted minim in FE. In GE only the mistake in bar 84 was corrected, while in EE – only in bar 83. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In the main text, we include the cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
The missing slur over the L.H. top voice seems to be an oversight if we take into account the respective slurs in bars 81-83 and 85-86. Moreover, it cannot be excluded that the engraver (or Chopin in [A]) omitted the slur, as there was no place for it. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding a slur to fill the gap. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
The lonely category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |