|
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In FE the augmentation dot to the f1 minim is missing. It was noticed and corrected both in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 85-86
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
Taking into account the generally complete slurring in this variation, the absence of a slur in FE (→GE,EE) is supposed to be considered an oversight. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a corresponding addition. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 86-87
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
Taking into account the slurs over all subsequent similar motifs, we consider the slur added – most probably by Chopin – to FEO to be a correction of a mistake and put it directly in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FEO |
|||||
|
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
According to us, it is highly likely that the slur, perhaps inaccurate in [A], was misinterpreted by the FE engraver (→GE,EE). Leaving out one semiquaver contradicts the general legato indication, provided by Chopin at the beginning of this variation (cf. also the slurs in similar motifs in bar 69, 79 and 82). Therefore, in the main text we provide a longer slur. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In FE the return to the bass clef in the L.H. from the beginning of bar 87 was omitted. The mistake was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
2 in 