|
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In EE the g1-g2 octave is a quaver, which is a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals to a1 and a. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
FC is missing the 3rd beat in the L.H., which was supplemented in GE by adding a crotchet rest. It is also FE (→EE) that contain a rest, hence there are no doubts that it was a crotchet rest that the copyist overlooked. Cf. a similar oversight by Fontana in the Mazurka in D category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of FC |
|||
|
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The pedalling of FC (→GE) must be inaccurate, as it was the case with bar 7. It is particularly obvious in bar 18, in which such long pedal leads to an awkward step in the next bar: an F category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||
|
b. 17-30
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In FC both poco a poco cresc. - - - indications (in bars 17-23 and 25-31) are added in Chopin's hand, which means that they were also added in the stage of proofreading FE or to the basis of FE. The same in bars 49-55 and 57-63. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
no. 3, 
after 3rd beat in 
-f diminished octave to e. Therefore, in the main text we give the more careful version of