|
b. 16-17
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We consider the interpretation of A's accents as long to be more probable, as they emphasise the imposition of longer rhythmic values (crotchets) on the triplet figuration. In the editions, all accents were recreated as short ones. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We add Chopin's fingering from the analogous place in bar 98 of FES as our proposal. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies |
|||||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The cautionary natural next to g1 is included in A (→GE) and FE. EE is lacking the sign; it cannot be excluded that it was deleted due to its redundancy, which is indicated by the gap between the notes and signs of possible proofing. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In A (→GE1) and EE1 there is no natural restoring g on the last quaver. It is undoubtedly Chopin's oversight, one of his most frequent ones. The sign was added in GE2 (→GE3→GE4) and EE2. It can be assumed that also the natural in FE was added during the proofing (it is absent in the analogous bar 98). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration |
|||||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FES Chopin wrote the fingering which is given by us as the editors' proposal. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies |
