mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 1

composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor

in A (→FE→EE) & GE

No indication in FC
..

The absence of  in FC must be the copyist's mistake. It is unclear on what grounds that indication was added in GE – most probably it was a particularly opportune revision.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC

b. 1

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

 in A (→FC→GE)

 in FE (→EE)
..

The  marking present in FE (→EE) instead of the authentic  indication must have resulted from the engraver's carelessness – see the Prelude in E minor no. 14.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2

b. 1

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

In the main text, we include the fingering coming from Chopin, and written into FED.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 1-6

composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor

..

In A we can see that the pairs of chords in b. 1-2 and 5-6 were initially provided with staccato dots and not slurs. In b. 1 the dots were deleted and replaced with a slur; in the remaining ones, Chopin wrote the slurs in a way so as to cover the dots.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 1

composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major

..

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Changes of tempo markings