b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The change of time signature in FE probably resulted from the engraver's inattention. In Chopin's pieces, it was common that engravers did not differentiate between and , see the Prelude No. 14 in E Minor. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
In this bar Fontana overlooked all performance indications except the slur, i.e. , pedalling markings, accents and the staccato dot in the bass. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
Fontana overlooked the pedalling markings (as well as almost all performance indications in this bar). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The missing staccato dot is an oversight of the copyist and the engraver of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The absence of in FC must be the copyist's mistake. It is unclear on what grounds that indication was added in GE – most probably it was a particularly opportune revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |