|
b. 1-4
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In EE the accents in the first four bars, just like in the practically entire piece, are short. It is an arbitrary change of the revisers. Long accents, most probably written by Chopin in [A], are present here only in FE. The first three accents of GE introduce a certain ambiguity, since their typeface is slightly different (they are narrower) than of the remaining marks in this source – perhaps they are also supposed to be interpreted as long. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 1-3
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In FE there are no separate fermatas for the octaves in the L.H. The marks were added by the revisers of GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The use of the adverb suffix -mente was characteristic for pieces of young Chopin. In the main text, we include the proofreading – probably by Chopin – in FE (→EE). In EE, in addition, the older, obsolete form simplice was replaced with its contemporary counterpart semplice. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The later start of the slur could have been introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1 (→FE→EE) – cf. other motifs of this theme with identical rhythm, e.g. in bars 3 and 25. However, in the main text we start the slur from the 1st note of the bar, in accordance with A, since the authenticity of the version of GE1 is uncertain. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1 |
raising e
2 to e2 is absent. It is difficult to explain this oversight other than by haste. The mistake was corrected already in 
