Issues : Errors of GC
b. 277-278
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The GC (→GE1) version, although harmonically and pianistically quite possible, is probably erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 283-287
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the slur ends in bar 283 at the end of the page. The fact that it is not continued on the next page is probably an oversight. We adopt the consistent version of EE and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||
b. 283-287
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
It is one of the places in which the performance and concert tradition, shaped to a significant extent on GE and established by the deeply rooted for many decades belief that GC is Chopin's autograph, most probably conveys an erroneous text. The absence of visible corrections in the sources based directly on [A] – GC and FE – means that one of the versions is most probably erroneous. The significant majority of arguments supports the correctness of the chord with b, which we thereby give in the main text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 288-291
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the 3rd quaver of the L.H. sounds as b1. At the same time we can see in the manuscript that it was corrected from a1. Taking into consideration the regularity of figuration in all the analogous places, it is hard not to treat the version of GC (→GE) as anything more than an error. Cf. the note to bar 294. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC , Alterations in GC |